Someone reminded me of one of my favorite touring destinations in Chicagoland: the Farnsworth House, just south of Plano, IL. The drive itself is only OK. The Fox River Valley is mostly straight, flat, and densely populated, with few twisties. But the destination is worth the trip.
The house was done by architect Mies van der Rohe, for Edith Farnsworth between 1945 and 1951. Along with Philip Johnson's "Glass House" (done for himself) and a number of office towers, it has become an icon of the Minimalist School. Minimalism was famously summed up by Mies as "Less is more."
Minimalism can be seen as an architectural counterpart to car-styling preferences. People who like knotty-pine paneling and embroidered samplers find minimalism austere and cold. If they care about cars at all, they like cars that make an emotional statement. For people who prefer minimalism (like me), the kitsch of a "homey home" is clutter. Minimalists say "If it's not functional, out it goes." At one extreme, automotively speaking, we have what General Motors offered 1958-59. At the other, in the same era, we have the Italian School: PininFarina and Bertone.
Edith Farnsworth was a single, middle-aged, "liberated," woman with a thriving medical practice in Chicago which allowed her to indulge her tastes. She asked Mies to do a weekend getaway cottage for the Fox River frontage she owned. Even though their tastes were in synch, it was an unhappy professional (and gossip said personal) relationship. It eventually resulted in a lawsuit for over-billing and inadequate provision for practicalities, which Mies won. An example: the screens for the porch never worked properly. Frank Lloyd Wright's houses caused similar complaints from their owners. His houses were expensive to maintain, if they could be maintained at all without constant rebuilding. When you're rich, and want to indulge your tastes and ego by hiring a famous architect, bring even more money and aspirin than you'd planned, for his ego.
One reason the Farnsworth House took so long to complete was that Mies and Farnsworth took pains with the smallest details and the design went through several refinements. Mies revised the details of proportions and the central core in minor ways several times, although the size and look of the house was not changed. Construction was complex too. The basic structure is a single welded-up steel frame, so care had to be taken with window fitment (especially at the four corners). Everything in the house (including the steel for the frame) was manufactured to special order with the exception of minor items like sinks, a bathtub, and some appliances.
Obviously personal privacy is not a hallmark of the design. But Farnsworth's lot was a large one (about 20 acres), and the house is sited so that it can be seen only from the river. Sixty years ago, the Fox had much less recreational use than it does today. Farnsworth and the subsequent private owner allowed a few smaller trees and some low scrub growth to reclaim the river bank, providing privacy that the glass walls don't. She used the house frequently until she retired, when she lived there full time until her death.
If you're interested in minimalist architecture and are in the Chicago area, you can visit the Farnsworth House; Google its website for information.
1 comment:
It would be a shame to have this house ruined by flood. Though one wouldn’t think this house has been flooded 3 times, as it looks as immaculate as ever. But of course, given that this is a tourist destination, caretakers would have to do a fantastic job in making sure any damages would be fix flawlessly.
Gail Wallace @ Emergency Flood Masters
Post a Comment