Saturday, June 13, 2015
Driver Coaching (James May & Jackie Stewart On "Top Gear")
Once again, I can "relate" to James May. Jackie Stewart jumps in a car he hasn't driven before and lays down a lap of 1:59. May's baseline lap is 2:26--27 seconds slower. Stewart says May can go 20 seconds faster. It takes him an entire day of coaching, but May finally does a 2:06. Still 7 seconds off Stewart's time. That's the difference between the naturals and us mere mortals.
As one who has been coached, I can attest that the lessons taught make perfect sense. They're easy to understand. The trick is consistent execution. And when you get frustrated with your own inconsistency, you may think to yourself what May says outloud: "This is probably will happen to me in Hell: a TVR, a race track, and a pedantic Scotsman." ;-)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5rpFXdWtK4
Thursday, June 11, 2015
Nissan Nismo LMP1 "GT-R"
Well... this is interesting... I didn't realize the Nissan LMP1 car was a front-driver until Leno's Garage hit me over the head with it. It's an interesting re-think of the hybrid rules for LMP1. The need for unobstructed venturi tunnels reverses fifty-five years of rear engine/rear-drive design theory.
Driver visibility is nil (not that it's great in other current prototypes). Which makes close-quarters racing hard, not to mention nailing apexes. So I'm guessing the team orders will be "Don't race wheel-to-wheel, run to our bogey lap time." That's the old John Wyer theory about the route to victory at LeMans. Everything old is new again.
It's hard to understand how this car won't eat its front tires. But as a devoted (old) Mini and Civic Si fan, I'll be rooting for it at LeMans. When I'm not paying close attention to the GT category, where the real fun and interest are.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=fw_2N3tGMEg
Tuesday, June 9, 2015
SERA And The Porsche 917
One reason I "go on" about the 917 is that it was a case-study in race car development. When the aero lift was sorted at the end of 1969, the Wyer-Gulf team, under the impression that it was the factory team, said "Let's get on with refining pace and especially reliability. This is about the World Endurance Championship and LeMans." That was Ferry Porsche's idea too, and the reason why Wyer had been hired: to reduce the cost of Porsche's racing budget.
Ferdinand Piech, Porsche's Racing Director, was having none of that. Every aspect of the 917 was continuously and relentlessly developed: weight-reduction, body, frame, brakes, power-train. Up to and including the 12-cylinder turbo and 16-cylinder atmospheric engine for Can-Am racing after FIA regs made the 917 obsolete for the WEC. Or, as Piech said when lifting a dust-cover to show Wyer the 16-cylinder, "Auntie doesn't know about this." He meant his Uncle Ferry (and had mixed up his English nouns).
Most of the facts and illustrations in this post come from Walter Naher's excellent book, Porsche 917 Archive And Works Catalog. From it we learn that SERA consulted on the 917's aerodynamics from the beginning, not just on the "Pink Pig" LeMans car of 1971. SERA (Societe d'Etudes et de Realisations Automobiles) was an engineering consulting firm, specializing in aerodynamics, owned by Charles Deutsch. He had started it after his (mostly racing) car-building partnership with Rene Bonnet was dissolved in 1961.
![]() |
| A 1:5 model of the 917 as tested in various configurations in the SERA wind tunnel in February, 1969, two months before the 917 was homologated by the FIA. |
For Porsche, LeMans had always been the crown jewel of the World Sports Car Championship. While the 917 was built to contest the Championship, a LeMans win was as just as important. And the key to winning LeMans was high sustained speed down the four-mile Mulsanne Straight. The key to that was low drag. So the 917's shape was copied from the very successful 907 (2-liter) and 908 (3-liter) long tail cars.
Even as Porsche was testing a 1:5 (and later a 1:1) model of the 917 in the Stuttgart wind tunnel, the 1:5 model was sent to SERA in February, 1969. For stability, Deutsch suggested (and tested) a tall dorsal fin like a jet airliner's tail. He also suggested two smaller fins (as shown in #4 above). A tail configured like the 908 LH's, as used at LeMans later that year, was also tested (as shown in #3 above). None of these configurations showed a conclusive advantage in the wind tunnels. And, while the 917 LH was homologated with the 908 LH-like tail, it remained aerodynamically unstable throughout 1969.
Although Walter Naher doesn't make it explicit, Porsche must have contacted SERA in the summer or fall of 1969, asking Deutsch to take a shot at a nose with better downforce. The result was tested at Zeltweg in Austria in October. Also at the Zeltweg test was the 917 Spyder Jo Siffert had run, and tinkered with, in the Can-Am series in the States. For the last race, Siffert had come up with a McLaren-like "chisel nose" that came to a sharp point, with vertical splitters and large "dive planes."
The key to the 917's aero stability was at the rear, and was unlocked with the Horsman K tail (at the Zeltweg test) and a large wing across the full width of the LH tail (in the spring of 1970). The "production" nose of the 917 was new but evolutionary, borrowing from both SERA and Siffert. It had the flatter bottom and more squared-off corners of the SERA nose, but the smaller oil-cooler inlet of the Siffert nose. Unlike either, the leading edge was "stood up" vertically with the brake ducts adjoining the oil cooler.
Shortly after the 1970 LeMans win, Porsche scheduled a meeting with SERA to discuss body developments for 1971. The goal was a short-tail coupe with the same downforce as the production K tail but lower drag. A shorter nose, like the 908/3's, and other detail modifications were also desired.
It was decided that SERA would compete with Porsche Design, and they came up with radically different designs. SERA's won the competition because its open wheel wells were better for tire changes. It had slab sides below the centerline, rounded wheel-arch contours, and a vestigial front splitter.
At the 1971 LeMans Test Days, it was "deja vu all over again" for the Pink Pig: unstable at high speeds and under braking. Between then and the race itself, the car was tested in a wind tunnel and found to have drag higher than both the LH and the latest finned version of the iconic K tail, doubtless due to the Pink Pig's larger frontal area. The stability problem was solved with much stiffer springs and a much higher rear spoiler and "Gurney Lip."
In the 1971 race, the Pink Pig qualified with a time of 3:21, two seconds off the pace of the latest, magnesium-framed conventional 917 K and seven seconds slower than the latest version of the LH. It retired from 6th place well into the race when it was crashed at Arnage Corner. In the Porsche episode of his Victory By Design TV series, Alain de Cadenet, who raced at LeMans that year, said that the vortex of low pressure behind the Pink Pig nearly sucked him off the road. It was way more pronounced than the conventional LH's and K's.
So the Pink Pig was a failure as measured against its design goals. But it was a harbinger of aerodynamic features to come: slab sides, a front splitter, and contoured wheel arches.
Sunday, June 7, 2015
45th Anniversary of Porsche's First Win At LeMans
Porsche is coming back to LeMans this year, contesting overall victory with Audi (which has been winning LeMans for years, once even disguised as a "Bentley"), Nissan, and Toyota. But after wins by the 935, 936, 956, and 962 in the 1970's and 1980's, I hope I can be excused for being a little jaded about Porsche's return. Besides, Prototypes are so butt ugly these days...
I'm not jaded about Porsche's first overall win, in 1970--in my favorite big-bore sports racing car, the 917. I was busy with school and establishing myself as an adult in '67, '68, and '69, when Porsche was racking up more class wins and Ford ruled the LeMans overall wins. The 917 had escaped my notice. It was a turkey in 1969 anyway. So it surprised me to learn that Porsche had won overall in 1970. "Wow--Porsche can play in the big leagues!"
![]() |
| Le Depart: 917 K's and LH's and Ferrari 512's as far as the eye can see. The eventual winner is buried mid-field. |
Friday, June 5, 2015
"If It's June, It Must Be LeMans."
...with my apologies to the romantic comedy movie "If This Is Tuesday, It Must Be Belgium."
LeMans is an excuse to do a couple of (upcoming) posts about the Porsche 917 which, in a larger sense, are about racing sports car development. But first, a post about my fascination with LeMans itself. It is of course the grand-daddy of endurance races. Daytona also lasts 24 hours, and Sebring for 12, but most of them last 6 hours. LeMans remains the toughest.
The first LeMans was in 1923 and the point of it, more or less, has always been to demonstrate speed and reliability. Before World War Two, the regulations limited entrants to bona-fide production cars. The Bentleys which dominated the race around the turn of the 1930's were four-seaters. They also inspired the Brits' fascination with LeMans--right up to the present--in an era when England had nothing to offer for Grand Prix starting grids. And thus the English-language sports car press, and thus (probably) mine.
Given its emphasis on (theoretically) streetable sports cars, LeMans has always been the playground of manufacturers, who wanted to improve and market their wares. It established Ferrari more than his early Mille Miglia wins. Besides Bentley, it established Jaguar and Aston Martin. It was the first international race entered by Porsche, and class wins put Porsche on the map. They turned the 550 Spyder into a series-produced race car, for sale to private entrants. Everybody wants to win LeMans. Ask Ford. Ask Corvette. Ask Mazda, Nissan, Toyota, Audi, and Peugeot.
![]() |
| Can a 4-seater touring car win LeMans? Yes, if it's a Bentley. I'm not sure where this picture was taken. It looks like Mulsanne Corner. If so, the houses were long-gone by the postwar era. |
Wednesday, June 3, 2015
Harry Metcalfe Takes Us To School On The 911 Turbo
First, an apology for the first of a series of Porsche posts stacked up in the editing que. It just worked out that way.
As regular readers know, in Pilote's World, there's no such thing as a water-cooled Porsche. ;-) The 911 Turbo (OK, purists, 930) is therefore a real Porsche, but I can't say this video helps to elevate it over the 2.7 Carrera as my favorite 911. As James May put the lethality in Cars Of The People: "There goes another stockbroker..."
Metcalfe explains how to deal with turbo lag toward the end of this video. ("Back the corner up" is always good advice...) But in his comprehensive tour of the cockpit, he fails to mention the lock buttons on the forward edges of the doors. In the days before automatic central locking, it was nice to just push the button instead of having to twist in the seat to reach over your shoulder. He should dwell on the instruments--the dash and tach of the classic 911's are the best to be found anywhere.
I wonder if Metcalfe is about 20 years younger than I am? He seems to be as imprinted with the (ridiculous, I would say) Ferraris and Lamborghinis of the 1980's as I am with those of the 1960's. Regardless, when it comes to 911's, Harry gets it:
https://youtu.be/cDo67maiZDo
Monday, June 1, 2015
Purdy Car
The Squire has always seemed to me the ultimate refinement of the lines of the pre-war sports car. Having, of course, never seen one in the flesh. ;-) The hood line is almost as low as the crowns of the fenders, the grille is raked and behind the centerline of the front wheels, the placement of the headlights is just right, and there are no bumpers. For those interested in the technical details and a short history of the marque, here's a link:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squire_Car_Manufacturing_Company

















