Friday, July 13, 2012

Thanks, Butzi.

Ferdinand Alexander "Butzi" Porsche died in April, aged 76.

"Butzi" Porsche with the 911 when it was introduced in 1963.

The 911 was Butzi's car, a request from his father Ferry to do a bigger, faster, replacement for the 356.  Quite an assignment for a 24-year-old, just out of design school.  He didn't do the entire car in detail; he led the design team and did the body himself.  The new SOHC 6-cylinder engine came from Porsche's engine department.  It had a lot to do with the car "making its bones."  Erwin Komenda, head of styling, had to clean up the manufacturing engineering of body details for easier and more practical assembly.  But nobody, then or later, claimed that that car was anyone's but Butzi's.

The 911 was remarkable when introduced: 130 h.p. from 2 liters, when most sports cars that size had 70-100.  It had the first 5-speed gearbox available in a production car.  (The engine liked to be kept high in its rev range.)    Among "affordable" sports cars, only the Jaguar XK-E and the Corvette had more power.  And Butzi hit a home run with the body.  It looked exactly like what it was, a fast Porsche.  The Corvette and the 911 are still with us, albeit as barely recognizable mutations.  Internally, for parts purposes, the 911 has been a 964, 993, 996, 997, and a 991.

Some Porsche Snobs (even those who never owned one, like me) will tell you that there is no such thing as a water-cooled Porsche.  For us, the run ended in 1997 with the 993.  We sneer at models like the 928, 924, and, God help us, the Cayenne and the Panamera.  But then, you can find Porsche Snobs who will tell you that the only true Porsche was the 356.

Butzi did the interior too.  The complete instrumentation with a big, central, tach said "driver's car."  7000 revs was a lot for a street car in 1963.  This dash was widely "adapted."  By Mazda's RX-7, for instance.


911 Carrera RS: probably the funnest 911 of them all for an amateur on public roads or at track days.  The tricky oversteer of the early cars was gone and the weight-to-power ratio was about 11:1.  Side stripe delete option, anyone?

The street car that many 911 freaks prize most highly is the 1973 Carrera RS.  In 1969, the wheelbase was increased 2.5 inches, diminishing the car's tail-happy handling.  The RS's 2.7 liter engine took horsepower up to 210, which was very competitive with the "big dogs" in those early days of smog-control.  The suspension was revised and stiffened, and the rear track and fenders widened.  The RS 2.7's calling card was its ducktail spoiler.  Although it still oversteered at the limit, the handling was progressive, predictable, and manageable.  It was a quick car.  The later, more iconic 930 Turbo was faster--but more of a handful.  The RS was fast and easy to drive and live with.

There's a Porschephile school of thought that says original only.  Anything else is defacing the car.  It's similar to the views of some muscle-car collectors who bid painstaking restorations into the stratosphere at Barrett-Jackson, or the way Bloomington Gold grades Corvettes.  I'm not of that school.  Butzi imparted a look and  feel to the 911 that can be enhanced if you don't go overboard.  Here's a good example:

"Dirty Penny," a 911 SC upgraded to RS specification by Pelican Parts in the 1990's.  What's not to like about wide, dished, Panasport wheels?  The car rocks Porsche's metallic "Cocoa Brown"too. 

On street cars, I love the sound of the cooling fan at high revs.  On race cars, I love the raspy sound of the straight-through exhausts.  The brakes are superb, the handling is good, and the view from and feel of the cockpit are among the best.  Thanks again for a great car, Butzi.

Butzi in 2010, aged 74.  Besides the 911, he designed the 904 before leaving to start his own industrial design firm.  He remained connected with Porsche throughout his life as a member of the board of directors.

Thursday, July 12, 2012

Because Race Car

 The car was unsuccessful.  It had the misfortune to come out in the same season as the Lotus 49-Cosworth, which waxed it (and the other GP cars too).  I just like the car and the picture.

Ferrari 312, Monaco, 1967

Wanna see my engine? Wanna see it again?


When 30-odd horsepower from a 1-liter cast iron 4 was enough.  This is a 12-volt conversion: the battery didn't used to be as big as the mill.  That's a non-standard "racing" air-cleaner.


Them Were The Days, Or...

as a Detroit-raised friend of mine might say, "Suck It, Enzo..."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEGUwvBG3rQ&feature=relmfu

Oh, Come ON Now, Ken...

 Ken Block's videos are getting outrageouser and outrageouser.  And sillier and sillier.  And longer and longer.  But I still love 'em.

The covering email said DC Shoes and Monster Energy paid San Francisco $1 million to film it.  And that SF was glad to help with permits and public safety.  Well...duh...  Cities are filing for bankruptcy these days.

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Was Billy Mitchell Cribbing From Bertone? Vice-Versa?

  



Giovanni Bertone did a one-off body on a Ferrari 250 GT SWB (short wheelbase) for the 1961 Geneva Auto Show.  The "insider" cue he was following was the "shark nose" that would appear on the Ferrari Grand Prix cars that year.  The rest of the car fell into place around that.  (Well..."fell into place" if you're Bertone or Pininfarina or Scaglietti...)  It had a small, airy, greenhouse unlike any Ferrari GT that came before, or after.

  The same year, Billy Mitchell came up with a "bubble top" roofline for Chevy and Pontiac, unlike anything seen before out of GM Design:

1962 Chevy Bel Air "bubble top" 409.  She's real fine.

These rooflines went away after a couple of years. For one thing, the large, curved, rear glass was expensive.  For another, air-conditioning was challenged by all that glass.  But this greenhouse (aptly named in this case) has always appealed to me: excellent rearward vision and a feel as close as you can come to a convertible or a sunroof without having one.  They just look right.

Was Billy Mitchell was copying Bertone, or the other way around, or was it just the zeitgeist?  Mitchell did most of the sharpest-looking GM cars made.  He took the whole GM line away from the wretched excess of the Harley Earl cars of the late 1950's toward a minimalist, taut, look.  His reputation could stand on the Stingray Corvette alone.  But he also did the "Wide Track" Pontiacs of the early 1960's, the first generation Camaro, and the mid-sized GM lines that became muscle cars.  Not a bad body of work.

Footnote: Bertone never sold more bodies like the Geneva Show car.  It may be because the car on the stand was dark blue--not the best color to emphasize its lines.  It was sold into California, where it remains today, resprayed first in light metallic green (better) and now silver (superb!).  In 1961 I thought the car was too "cute."  It wasn't as macho as the 250 GT SWB or the GTO.  But it wears well.  It's a lot more stylish than most of Ferrari's efforts from the '70's until very recently.

Meerkat-o-lader

Roush Merkur XR4Ti, Scott Pruett, Road America, 1988

Over the years, Trans-Am cars have gotten more and more forgettable.  Another tube-frame V-8 silhouette racer?  Spare me.  The exception, which has stuck in my memory for 20-odd years, was the Merkur XR4Ti.  I saw it run only once, in the Saturday support race for the CART event at Road America in 1988.

Jack Roush Racing brought two cars, one for Scott Pruett and another for Wally Dallenbach, Jr.  Pruett was obviously quick, so it was no surprise when he graduated to CART a year later.  What struck me as odd was that Roush, whom I thought of as a drag racer, was running a road racing team for Ford.  With benefit of hindsight, this was the beginning of the Roush empire.

Even more surprisingly, the car was powered by a 2.3 liter turbo 4.  Its pop-off valve charmed me.  It chirped, with three rapid "chit-chit-chit's," as fast as you can make the sound, when the drivers got into the valve.  Which was all the time: the car was set up to overboost.  Pruett would fly into the braking zone for Turn 5: chit-chit-chit!  He'd fly up the hill from Turn 5, shifting once: chit-chit-chit!  When he lifted for Turn 6, chit-chit-chit!  Sounded like "Meerkat Manor," but louder.

The XR4Ti's ran for only one season.  The road version was fast, but a sales failure.  It cost as much as a Corvette: big bucks for a hot-rodded German Ford Sierra.  It was sold through Lincoln-Mercury dealers--not your best demographic for sellers and buyers of Autobahn Burners.

We keep complaining, over here, that we don't get the best of Ford of Europe's stuff: they always soften up the car for our market.  Ford tried us once with the XR4Ti.  Now they're going to try us again with the Focus ST, which is identical to the Euro-spec car--at a more realistic price point than the Merkur's.